A few of us have talked about renting some dedicated hosting. Primarily collocation hosting. It'd mean upfront purchase and ownership of server, and only a monthly cost for rack space, power, internets, bandwidth.

Personally, I'm very tired for getting pw3nd by shared hosting providers. I do understand that it can't be perfect, but you still have to have a decent uptime, and you can't lie. I'd go into detail about how 1and1 has screwed with me over the years but I'll be brief (tried to cancel webhosting but keep Exchange, but told me I had to get a different Exchange account and transfer my mail, or else it would be lost since the Exchange was 'attached' to the webhosting. Seems like a billing problem, not MY problem. Also, if I call you to tell you your server has been down for 30 minutes, and I call and you fix it while I'm on hold, don't passively treat me like I'm bothering you because everything is working)

Also, their .net app restrictions are not the best.

Okay, it wasn't too brief. But I've played out the numbers assuming I purchase the server, and it'll cost you less than good meal per month.

Update: +1 BJ +1 SP +1PS

Check out http://ntsource.com/web-hosting/colocation-web-hosting.html

Update: BJ and PeterS have brought up cloud hosting options like Amazon's EC2 and GoGrid. I am not very familiar with these, and they seem to charged based on application. But if it were possible to have a single app running windows server 2008 VM, I could see it working.

Short but nerdy post.
Want a reason why Battlestar Galactica is better than Voyager? The series didn't suddenly end when they entered the orbit of Earth.
Those who know me, know I've complained about this before. BSG didn't make me start jumping wildly,"You've got to be kidding me?!!?!". People tried to calm me with the prospect of a follow-up movie, but wait.. what's that next Star Trek movie? That's right.... set way waaay before Voyager.

As Sam pointed out, hell has frozen over. I've practically changed over to Firefox and impatiently waiting for version 3 to come out tomorrow. I am one of the many who pledged to download tomorrow.
Compared to IE7, it supports my CSS much better. Which can be a problem. I make a site look perfect in FF, but looks horrible when many others pull it up in IE. No need to rant, but that's the way of the world. When developing, you must make it cross-browser. But this is also where the FF plugin for IE come in. I can easily change between browers within an IE tab to test a page. Also works well for site that require IE (OWA).
Another plugin is Ad-Block. I feel a bit guilty taking away ad content from sites, but most of the time I only do it for sites with HORRIBLE advertising. Example: Facebook. Advertisement are based on your personal status in your profile. I am listed as single, so they throw up singles ads. Makes sense right? Why is it that the majority of the ads sporting gay men? And yes, I know I opened myself up for jokes. Facebook is making a judgement, but they only looked as far as me being single. They didn't go the rest of the way to see what sex I listed as "interested in". *click* ads gone.
The plugin management, and autoupdate for each plugin is fantastic. I don't have to go back to the addon page to seek an update, it pops up and notifies me. Hooray. To be fair, FF3 RC3 has been a memory behemoth. I use it heavily @ work, and most of the time I cannot leave it running over night. It will typically crash once a day. Perhaps tomorrow will show improvement. Is that decent enough of a reason, Sam.

Two Hauppauge cards(HVR-1600 and HVR-1800) that will not tune QAM or OTA Digital. Now, the chances would seem to be slim, but what else could it be? When I take the coax from my tv (that tunes clear QAM), and plug it into my Hauppauge card, it fails. It was also a clean install of Vista. So now I RMA it again, at least they'll cover the shipping for an additional RMA

I've always been a fan of Media Center, even in its infancy.  But with ways to integrate Blu-ray, HD-dvd, Netflix, into a networked DVR on steroids, it makes Media Center a great choice for an all-in-one solution.

Fantastics aside, it's still plagued with problems that it should not have.  In order to get most of these features, you need to have t3h nerd skills which brings me to QAM.

Sweet (biblical reference), clear QAM support should be in Media Center!!!! Most cards support QAM now, but you need to use their application to tune it to QAM channels.

Many card manufacturers like Hauppauge,WinTV products, have taken to the task of creating ways to trick media center into tuning QAM. The Beta driver has you setup an OTA as if you're using an antenna.  Then you launch a separate application to map those channels to actual QAM channels from your cable service.
Put simply, it's a good thing they call it beta, so no hard feelings. They were driven to this horrid option.  Even talking to an employee of Hauppauge, he/she was not able to get it to work.  In addition to that, there was a report that after installation, it hosed *something* and QAM wouldn't even work in the WinTV app. Eeeek!

Nevertheless, I'm doing a clean install of Vista, prepping a disk image, and will be reporting back some findings!
 

Edit: go see a newer post of mine

web.config

comment <trust level="Medium" originUrl=".*" />
uncomment <httpCookies httpOnlyCookies="false"/>

SiteConfig\site.config

Modify obvious settings until <!-- END OF SUGGESTED SETTINGS -->

SiteConfig\siteSecurity.config

DO NOT CHANGE ADMIN PW.  It is encrypted. Log in and change it.