<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Peter's Blog - TV</title>
    <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/</link>
    <description>Not always right, but never wrong.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Peter F</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:43:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.1.8102.813</generator>
    <managingEditor>peter@peterf.net</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>peter@peterf.net</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Date: October 26, 2009<br />
Show: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1219024/">Castle</a><br />
Episode: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1501858/">Vampire Weekend</a></p>
        <p>
Alexis Castle: Didn't you wear that like 5 years ago?<br />
Richard Castle: so?<br />
Alexis Castle: so don't you think you should move on?<br />
Richard Castle: I like it
</p>
        <p>
The movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379786/">Serenity</a> was released
roughly 4 years ago, close enough. 4 years = like 5 years 
</p>
        <p>
Nathan as Mal in Serenity. Based off of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303461/">Firefly</a> TV
show
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/imdb%20nathan%20fillion%20serenity1.png" border="0" />
          <br />
          <a href="http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3796605184/tt0379786">http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3796605184/tt0379786</a>
        </p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
Costume in "Castle"
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/3%20-%20Copy.png" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/2.png" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/4.png" border="0" />
        <br />
        <br />
Edit: and yes, there is a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118276/">Buffy </a>reference! <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0923736/">Joss
Whedon</a> is getting some <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1135300/">extra</a> airtime
this week!<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749" /></body>
      <title>Nathan Fillion wears his "Space Cowboy" costume on Castle: FireFly fans rejoice</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/10/27/NathanFillionWearsHisSpaceCowboyCostumeOnCastleFireFlyFansRejoice.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Date: October 26, 2009&lt;br&gt;
Show: &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1219024/"&gt;Castle&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Episode: &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1501858/"&gt;Vampire Weekend&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Alexis Castle: Didn't you wear that like 5 years ago?&lt;br&gt;
Richard Castle: so?&lt;br&gt;
Alexis Castle: so don't you think you should move on?&lt;br&gt;
Richard Castle: I like it
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The movie &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379786/"&gt;Serenity&lt;/a&gt; was released
roughly 4 years ago, close enough. 4 years = like 5 years 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nathan as Mal in Serenity. Based off of &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303461/"&gt;Firefly&lt;/a&gt; TV
show
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/imdb%20nathan%20fillion%20serenity1.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3796605184/tt0379786"&gt;http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3796605184/tt0379786&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Costume in "Castle"
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/3%20-%20Copy.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/2.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/4.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Edit: and yes, there is a &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118276/"&gt;Buffy &lt;/a&gt;reference! &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0923736/"&gt;Joss
Whedon&lt;/a&gt; is getting some &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1135300/"&gt;extra&lt;/a&gt; airtime
this week!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,58bb4754-76b6-4b19-a231-943dacdfa749.aspx</comments>
      <category>Awesome Nerd Humor</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Happy Tuesday! Chris Lanier is a great
source for Media Center information. He posted this last week <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2009/09/03/1720490.aspx">http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2009/09/03/1720490.aspx</a><br /><br />
I've been so busy that I almost missed it!<br /><br />
I've complained in the past about CableCards and the DRM that ensues: <a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/10/10/WhyIsCableCardDRMBad.aspx">http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/10/10/WhyIsCableCardDRMBad.aspx</a><br /><br />
Chris's information comes in two flavors:<br />
A: Next firmware will support SDV (switched digital video)<br />
B: Next firmware will support relaxed DRM on specific channels<br /><br />
Now while nothing is final until I see it on my tuners and working, this is a bright
ray of sunshine coming for those of us in this deep hole. By "us", I mean the early
adopters that knew they could get screwed at any moment since there was no public
roadmap on how to handle different cable TV specifications.<br /><br />
What does this mean?<br /><ul><li>
Current ATI DCT owners will not get left behind as their Cable Operator moves to SDV</li><li>
Many current owners will be able to get the same channels as their Tivo/Cable operator
box<br /></li><li>
All recordings will no longer be laced with DRM (only recordings that are requested
to have DRM will be laced)</li><li>
Opens a window for DCT users to watch TV episodes on other computers since the extender
model was the only way to watch DCT DRM laced shows previously. You will be able to
watch DRM-less recordings on other computers</li></ul>
I expect all of this to be Windows 7 only. Always good to support Vista, but I won't
complain.<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085" /></body>
      <title>ATI Digital Cable Tuners will support SDV !!!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/09/08/ATIDigitalCableTunersWillSupportSDV.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Happy Tuesday! Chris Lanier is a great source for Media Center information. He posted this last week &lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2009/09/03/1720490.aspx"&gt;http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2009/09/03/1720490.aspx&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've been so busy that I almost missed it!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've complained in the past about CableCards and the DRM that ensues: &lt;a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/10/10/WhyIsCableCardDRMBad.aspx"&gt;http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/10/10/WhyIsCableCardDRMBad.aspx&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Chris's information comes in two flavors:&lt;br&gt;
A: Next firmware will support SDV (switched digital video)&lt;br&gt;
B: Next firmware will support relaxed DRM on specific channels&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now while nothing is final until I see it on my tuners and working, this is a bright
ray of sunshine coming for those of us in this deep hole. By "us", I mean the early
adopters that knew they could get screwed at any moment since there was no public
roadmap on how to handle different cable TV specifications.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What does this mean?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Current ATI DCT owners will not get left behind as their Cable Operator moves to SDV&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Many current owners will be able to get the same channels as their Tivo/Cable operator
box&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
All recordings will no longer be laced with DRM (only recordings that are requested
to have DRM will be laced)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Opens a window for DCT users to watch TV episodes on other computers since the extender
model was the only way to watch DCT DRM laced shows previously. You will be able to
watch DRM-less recordings on other computers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
I expect all of this to be Windows 7 only. Always good to support Vista, but I won't
complain.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,8b2130cb-e45f-4bdc-9c4c-5bde42913085.aspx</comments>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
      <category>Windows 7</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This is by no means a full review of Windows
7. I was beta testing for a while, and now I have my hands on the RTM (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#RTM">release
to manufacturing</a>). Naturally, I find a few more bugs in the release. They'll all
be submitted soon via MS Connect.<br /><br />
First off, my install went smoothly. The hardware is around 1.5 years old with a new
graphics card and hard drive. On first boot, my HomeGroup was found from my laptop
running build 7100. Very impressive.<br /><br />
My raid array was found with no issues. I actually felt that I did not need to install
any drivers to boost obvious performance. But being the nerd I am, I naturally hit
the graphics driver first from Nvidia.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/1-graphics%20driver%20install1.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
My only issues with tools like Nvidia's control panel are that Microsoft should be
stepping up to the plate and integrating these kind of tools. It will be much easier
for debugging when people are running raw drivers and no extra tools. I bet support
staff would love that also. Bravo Nvidia for giving me an easy way to check my HDCP
link!<br /><br />
Here is the kicker. I installed the Nvidia driver and it didn't require a reboot!?!?!?!??!!
That shocked me something fierce.<br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/2-performance.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Nothing really new here in the Performance control panel. Just higher numbers are
possible.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/3-personal%20folder%20setups.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Since Windows XP, I have always moved my personal documents to a separate HDD. It
makes OS reinstalls a piece of cake. Things get a little more interesting by having
setup. But I have all my data in a folder structure I've had in place for a while,
so no biggie there for me.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/4-media%20center%20startup.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
MMmmm. Media Center.The main reason for this install. Nice marketing info there MS....
We continue...<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/5-custom%20setup.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
I naturally go for the custom setup.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/6-PlayReady%20install.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
I'm not going to bore you with too many aimless screen shots. Here I am entering TV
setup<br />
For those familiar with TVPack and it's issues, you will love this. It is automatically
installing PlayReady for you. 
<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/7-cablecards%20found.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
My CableCards are found (2x). Nothing new<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/8-guide%20setup.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Guide setup. Nothing new.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/9-display%20setup.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Display setup offers nothing new: just the same old confusion. If I select TV, I will
fall victim to the interface "underzooming" to prepare for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overscan">overscan </a>that
doesn't exist on my TV. I can go on for a while on this topic.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/10-guide.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Here is the new guide. Nothing too new. Nice options for "right clicking" and being
able to change channel info. This was first introduced in Vista's TV Pack<br /><br /><img src="content/binary/10-start%20screen.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
This is the new "Start" screen. It is organized a little better. Movies is something
I plan on playing with more. I think there is a lot of wasted space on the today screen.
I wouldn't mind seeing some things moved around. If I scroll all the way up to the
top, I can only see one item. Huge space waste. Take a hint from the new home screen
on Windows Mobile 6.5.<br /><br /><img src="content/binary/11-guide%20download%20failboat.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
I tried searching for showings, but whoops! No guide to search from? But I just looked
at the guide. Was it not downloaded all the way? I went down to the Media Center tray
icon to see what info is available. Under TV Pack (and possibly non-TV Pack), I could
see what percentage of the guide was downloaded.<br /><br />
At this point, since I couldn't do anything useful, I shut down. The next day I turned
it on, came back a while later, and the search worked. I'd love to see some more robust
error messages here with some user options to intervene.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/12-setup%20recording.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Here I am setting up my series to record. Unfortunately, the search offers nothing
new except in the program data.<br />
But in the screenshot listed above, there is a neat little window that explains what
tv show I searched for. Ohh... look at that. Why are there HD and non-HD versions
listed? This is due to my cable company having duplicate channels. I will later have
to go through and delete these duplicate analog stations.<br /><br />
I would really appreciate a built in tool, possibly automatic when the guide is getting
setup, to automatically swap and delete channels. Example: I want my channel 2 to
be HD<br /><br />
Also, this screen's 'tabs' at the top are confusing. The screenshot above shows the
default view. If I didn't see those arrows hiding in the corner, I would have never
known that there was additional information available.<br /><br />
I had to fish around in the menus to find the options for series recording. A step
back there. But the same options when I found them.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/13-%20Program%20search%20bug.png" border="0" /><br /><br /><u><b>Bug: </b></u>Here comes a bug. I wanted to search for "Law &amp; Order". Searching
for "Law" gets me where I need, but I decided to type "&amp;" to refine my search
results.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/13-%20Program%20search%20bug2.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Boom, no results. I would qualify this as a bug. Without understanding how they're
searching, I'll throw out a guess that &amp; is jacking with their search parameters.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/14-Internet%20TV.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
I decided to play with Internet TV again. After this step, I had multiple Internet
TVs listed on the Start page. One listed as beta, one not.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/15-Internet%20TV%202.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
Sweet Arrested Development! Wait.... I'm searching for series, but why am I getting
individual seasons? I'd like to see all Arrested Development seasons listed under
a single show name.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/16-Internet%20TV%203.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
As I was getting ready to lay down and watch an episode of Arrested Development, I
was met with "Acts". Not quite sure what I'm expected to do with them. They're all
out of order anyway! I left, and have not returned yet to TV Series<br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/17-Internet%20TV%204.png" border="0" /><br /><br />
What I really did enjoy was the Viral videos! This is such a great way to waste time.
I did this until I fell asleep.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/18-focus%20error.png" border="0" /><br /><br /><b><u>Bug:</u></b> Every time I put in a USB flash drive or SD card, Windows pop up
always shows up behind other windows. Rather annoying. Don't pop anything up if I
can't use it. I'd rather go hunt through "computer" if I have to click extra times.<br /><br />
IE8- Someone needs to put their foot down and redo the version system. Here is my
recommendation<br />
IE6= IE6<br />
IE6.1= IE7<br />
IE6.2= IE8<br /><br />
So, IE6.2 is a good upgrade from 6.1. It adds a few new features, but overall gives
me nothing too new. <a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/02/10/InternetExplorer8CompatibilityViewIsAJoke.aspx">Read
more on what my thoughts are on IE8</a> .<br /><br /><br /><u><b>Bug:</b></u> Every time I restore or maximize Media Center, my cursor gets centered
on the screen. This is rather annoying when my cursor goes flying across the screen
and I have to hunt it down again.<br /><br /><br /><br />
Conclusion:<br />
Very exciting. I love the new desktop experience. I skipped over many things like
this because they've been covered in great detail by others<br /><br />
When I began writing this blog post, I wasn't expecting to finish with 3 bugs and
a few annoying rants about issues. But unfortunately, that's how I roll.<br /><br />
This was written to specifically lay out my first RTM impressions, more to come soon!<br /><br />
Peter<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138" /></body>
      <title>Windows 7: First 24 Hours with Peter</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/08/15/Windows7First24HoursWithPeter.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>This is by no means a full review of Windows 7. I was beta testing for a while, and now I have my hands on the RTM (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#RTM"&gt;release
to manufacturing&lt;/a&gt;). Naturally, I find a few more bugs in the release. They'll all
be submitted soon via MS Connect.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First off, my install went smoothly. The hardware is around 1.5 years old with a new
graphics card and hard drive. On first boot, my HomeGroup was found from my laptop
running build 7100. Very impressive.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My raid array was found with no issues. I actually felt that I did not need to install
any drivers to boost obvious performance. But being the nerd I am, I naturally hit
the graphics driver first from Nvidia.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/1-graphics%20driver%20install1.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My only issues with tools like Nvidia's control panel are that Microsoft should be
stepping up to the plate and integrating these kind of tools. It will be much easier
for debugging when people are running raw drivers and no extra tools. I bet support
staff would love that also. Bravo Nvidia for giving me an easy way to check my HDCP
link!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here is the kicker. I installed the Nvidia driver and it didn't require a reboot!?!?!?!??!!
That shocked me something fierce.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/2-performance.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nothing really new here in the Performance control panel. Just higher numbers are
possible.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/3-personal%20folder%20setups.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Since Windows XP, I have always moved my personal documents to a separate HDD. It
makes OS reinstalls a piece of cake. Things get a little more interesting by having
setup. But I have all my data in a folder structure I've had in place for a while,
so no biggie there for me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/4-media%20center%20startup.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
MMmmm. Media Center.The main reason for this install. Nice marketing info there MS....
We continue...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/5-custom%20setup.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I naturally go for the custom setup.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/6-PlayReady%20install.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm not going to bore you with too many aimless screen shots. Here I am entering TV
setup&lt;br&gt;
For those familiar with TVPack and it's issues, you will love this. It is automatically
installing PlayReady for you. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/7-cablecards%20found.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My CableCards are found (2x). Nothing new&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/8-guide%20setup.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Guide setup. Nothing new.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/9-display%20setup.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Display setup offers nothing new: just the same old confusion. If I select TV, I will
fall victim to the interface "underzooming" to prepare for the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overscan"&gt;overscan &lt;/a&gt;that
doesn't exist on my TV. I can go on for a while on this topic.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/10-guide.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here is the new guide. Nothing too new. Nice options for "right clicking" and being
able to change channel info. This was first introduced in Vista's TV Pack&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/10-start%20screen.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is the new "Start" screen. It is organized a little better. Movies is something
I plan on playing with more. I think there is a lot of wasted space on the today screen.
I wouldn't mind seeing some things moved around. If I scroll all the way up to the
top, I can only see one item. Huge space waste. Take a hint from the new home screen
on Windows Mobile 6.5.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/11-guide%20download%20failboat.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I tried searching for showings, but whoops! No guide to search from? But I just looked
at the guide. Was it not downloaded all the way? I went down to the Media Center tray
icon to see what info is available. Under TV Pack (and possibly non-TV Pack), I could
see what percentage of the guide was downloaded.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
At this point, since I couldn't do anything useful, I shut down. The next day I turned
it on, came back a while later, and the search worked. I'd love to see some more robust
error messages here with some user options to intervene.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/12-setup%20recording.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here I am setting up my series to record. Unfortunately, the search offers nothing
new except in the program data.&lt;br&gt;
But in the screenshot listed above, there is a neat little window that explains what
tv show I searched for. Ohh... look at that. Why are there HD and non-HD versions
listed? This is due to my cable company having duplicate channels. I will later have
to go through and delete these duplicate analog stations.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I would really appreciate a built in tool, possibly automatic when the guide is getting
setup, to automatically swap and delete channels. Example: I want my channel 2 to
be HD&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, this screen's 'tabs' at the top are confusing. The screenshot above shows the
default view. If I didn't see those arrows hiding in the corner, I would have never
known that there was additional information available.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I had to fish around in the menus to find the options for series recording. A step
back there. But the same options when I found them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/13-%20Program%20search%20bug.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bug: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/u&gt;Here comes a bug. I wanted to search for "Law &amp;amp; Order". Searching
for "Law" gets me where I need, but I decided to type "&amp;amp;" to refine my search
results.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/13-%20Program%20search%20bug2.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Boom, no results. I would qualify this as a bug. Without understanding how they're
searching, I'll throw out a guess that &amp;amp; is jacking with their search parameters.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/14-Internet%20TV.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I decided to play with Internet TV again. After this step, I had multiple Internet
TVs listed on the Start page. One listed as beta, one not.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/15-Internet%20TV%202.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sweet Arrested Development! Wait.... I'm searching for series, but why am I getting
individual seasons? I'd like to see all Arrested Development seasons listed under
a single show name.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/16-Internet%20TV%203.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As I was getting ready to lay down and watch an episode of Arrested Development, I
was met with "Acts". Not quite sure what I'm expected to do with them. They're all
out of order anyway! I left, and have not returned yet to TV Series&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/17-Internet%20TV%204.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What I really did enjoy was the Viral videos! This is such a great way to waste time.
I did this until I fell asleep.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/18-focus%20error.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Bug:&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Every time I put in a USB flash drive or SD card, Windows pop up
always shows up behind other windows. Rather annoying. Don't pop anything up if I
can't use it. I'd rather go hunt through "computer" if I have to click extra times.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
IE8- Someone needs to put their foot down and redo the version system. Here is my
recommendation&lt;br&gt;
IE6= IE6&lt;br&gt;
IE6.1= IE7&lt;br&gt;
IE6.2= IE8&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So, IE6.2 is a good upgrade from 6.1. It adds a few new features, but overall gives
me nothing too new. &lt;a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/02/10/InternetExplorer8CompatibilityViewIsAJoke.aspx"&gt;Read
more on what my thoughts are on IE8&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bug:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/u&gt; Every time I restore or maximize Media Center, my cursor gets centered
on the screen. This is rather annoying when my cursor goes flying across the screen
and I have to hunt it down again.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Conclusion:&lt;br&gt;
Very exciting. I love the new desktop experience. I skipped over many things like
this because they've been covered in great detail by others&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When I began writing this blog post, I wasn't expecting to finish with 3 bugs and
a few annoying rants about issues. But unfortunately, that's how I roll.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This was written to specifically lay out my first RTM impressions, more to come soon!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Peter&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,23cdb0a6-ff0f-4ed2-9df0-6129d2c16138.aspx</comments>
      <category>Browser</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
      <category>Windows 7</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Comcast is here to please again. Almost
a month after sucking in new customers with the OTA Digital TV Transition, Comcast
is changing customers (at least in my area) to all digital.  Currently, stations
like ABC/CBS/NBC/FOX that broadcast in digital only, are down converted to analog
for cable customer use. Other stations on cable are also broadcast in analog.<br /><br />
This is all changing. I have mixed feelings. Overall, my negative feelings reside
with the timing. Almost exactly a month after the OTA transition, they're announcing
the change?<br /><br />
Their FAQ page is horribly misleading.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.comcast.com/Customers/Faq/FaqDetails.ashx?Id=4618">Are there any
ways that I can make my old television set work?</a><br /><br /><i>If you subscribe to Comcast cable, we will take care of you.  You won't need
to worry about getting a new TV if you subscribe to a Comcast cable package.  </i><br /><br />
Comcast will offer some converter boxes, but that doesn't plug the hole. I have a
friend that has 5-6 TVs in his house. Comcast won't give him enough converters. What
if someone had OTA TV and decided to research pay TV. Cable suckered them in with
no need for boxes and the customer avoided DirecTV/Dish. Whoops, well don't worry
about that, you wanted to pay for their DVR anyway, right?<br /><br />
Onto the positive. If comcast broadcasts one digital station, theoretically, my HDTV
will display in full resolution. Anyone who doesn't have an HDTV should view the same
signal, but at a lower resolution.<br /><br />
I have noticed on a comcast Digital Tuner box that it will display black on a low
res TV that is tuned to a HD channel.<br /><br />
Time will tell how it plays out, anyone else have any additional info on this?<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911" /></body>
      <title>Comcast is Converting to All Digital</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/07/09/ComcastIsConvertingToAllDigital.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Comcast is here to please again. Almost a month after sucking in new customers with the OTA Digital TV Transition, Comcast is changing customers (at least in my area) to all digital.&amp;nbsp; Currently, stations like ABC/CBS/NBC/FOX that broadcast in digital only, are down converted to analog for cable customer use. Other stations on cable are also broadcast in analog.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is all changing. I have mixed feelings. Overall, my negative feelings reside
with the timing. Almost exactly a month after the OTA transition, they're announcing
the change?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Their FAQ page is horribly misleading.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.comcast.com/Customers/Faq/FaqDetails.ashx?Id=4618"&gt;Are there any
ways that I can make my old television set work?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;If you subscribe to Comcast cable, we will take care of you.&amp;nbsp; You won't need
to worry about getting a new TV if you subscribe to a Comcast cable package.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Comcast will offer some converter boxes, but that doesn't plug the hole. I have a
friend that has 5-6 TVs in his house. Comcast won't give him enough converters. What
if someone had OTA TV and decided to research pay TV. Cable suckered them in with
no need for boxes and the customer avoided DirecTV/Dish. Whoops, well don't worry
about that, you wanted to pay for their DVR anyway, right?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Onto the positive. If comcast broadcasts one digital station, theoretically, my HDTV
will display in full resolution. Anyone who doesn't have an HDTV should view the same
signal, but at a lower resolution.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have noticed on a comcast Digital Tuner box that it will display black on a low
res TV that is tuned to a HD channel.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Time will tell how it plays out, anyone else have any additional info on this?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,557d08a5-00ec-41fb-af1a-76af84880911.aspx</comments>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">We've all been bit by the Cable Companies
at one point or another. Lately, it seems to revolve around DRM, TV over Internet,
etc.  I'm no fool, I understand everything they're doing, yet I do not agree.<br /><br />
They used to have the only major pipeline for TV into people's home. This is changing:<br /><ol><li>
Now people are receiving HD broadcasts over the air (cables' customers who tune into
only primetime shows, this is a threat)</li><li>
People are using the internet connection through the Cable Company to obtain LEGAL
internet TV. Netflix, Hulu, YouTube all provide fantastic and easy resources to bypass
live TV</li></ol>
Somewhat recently, <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Comcast-250GB-Cap-Goes-Live-October-1-97294">Comcast
put a 250GB monthly cap</a> on internet connections. Why would they do this? Naturally
for reason #2 listed above. This is still opinion and speculation on my part. Many
others agree, others have alternative ideas (mostly revolving around the companies
beening ran by zombie devils or something). It comes down them not wanting to change,
and force customers down a certain path. this lack of innovation will be their doom.<br /><br />
TV Studios created sites like Hulu and their corp sites to host shows. WHOA! That
is a huge sidestep to cable companies! So now the customers and tv companies are both
upset with cable companies? Instead of innovating and finding alternative solutions,
companies like Comcast are sticking to their positions and solidifying by imposing
limits on how much you can download. I've never hit the 250 GB limit, but someday
I might with the way things are going!<br /><br />
Comcast said they imposed the limit to stop the few from abusing the service. This
is BS. If you were getting so overloaded, why was it that months later you double
all of our internet speeds and now offer up to 50mbps? Guess you have the capacity
to handle it all, don't you?<br /><br />
Most customers will pass this off as "the limit will not affect me" and "well, whatever,
now my speeds are faster!!!".  Screw that, they jacked the speeds up ONLY after
they were getting speed competition from Verizon FIOS and AT&amp;T U-Verse. This was
done to keep their current customers and to keep the eyes of their customers covered.<br /><br />
I'm sounding like a ranting liberal who hates "the man", but I hate being treated
like a moron. I am not. I do not know everything, but I damn well know when I'm being
played.<br /><br />
Here is what Comcast and others should do to innovate:<br /><ol><li>
They support different channel packages via CableCard. If you pay for HBO, "zap" and
now you have HBO. Stop paying your bill "zap!!", all premium channels are gone. 
I should be able to go through a checklist and be able to add/remove any channel that
I want to. I'd love to get rid of Oxygen and replace it with ESPN7. This offers a
fantastic option to customers with a system you already have in place<br /></li><li>
You need to go all in on this CableCard fiasco. You're really starting to piss off
your average joe of a customer. Why should your Motorola Comcast box with a CableCard
get all the channels and On-Demand while my Tivo/Vista Media Center with a Cable Card
can only get most channels and no On-Demand? Don't tell me that it's hard to innovate.
You need to kick <u><i><b>your</b></i></u> CableLabs in the butt and have it be much
more helpful to 3rd party OEMs. I'm still waiting for my freaking SDV adapter for
my ATI Digital Tuners. It is certainly an issue that needs to be worked on by Microsoft/ATI
in addition to CableLabs, but don't you think it would go much more smoothly if CableLabs
was actively assisting and cared? It has been deemed illegal to force people to use
your cable boxes. You're working on borrowed time while Tru2Way is deployed. You'd
better be more freaking friendly before everyone has an easy option to ditch your
box.</li><li>
Some cable companies are offering video on demand watch shows. But once again, I need
your box to get that! But all in all, it's still not ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX,etc's raw show
programming offerings. You're offering yet again another proprietary system to add
another ball an chain to your customers. Make a system similar to Netflix that allows
your TV customers to access it. Maybe even sell the internet only version to people!
I'm already paying for netflix to watch TV and movies, why would I be opposed to paying
for it?<br /></li></ol><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7" /></body>
      <title>TV Provider Companies Need to Take a Long Hard Look at Themselves</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/03/10/TVProviderCompaniesNeedToTakeALongHardLookAtThemselves.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>We've all been bit by the Cable Companies at one point or another. Lately, it seems to revolve around DRM, TV over Internet, etc.&amp;nbsp; I'm no fool, I understand everything they're doing, yet I do not agree.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They used to have the only major pipeline for TV into people's home. This is changing:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Now people are receiving HD broadcasts over the air (cables' customers who tune into
only primetime shows, this is a threat)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
People are using the internet connection through the Cable Company to obtain LEGAL
internet TV. Netflix, Hulu, YouTube all provide fantastic and easy resources to bypass
live TV&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
Somewhat recently, &lt;a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Comcast-250GB-Cap-Goes-Live-October-1-97294"&gt;Comcast
put a 250GB monthly cap&lt;/a&gt; on internet connections. Why would they do this? Naturally
for reason #2 listed above. This is still opinion and speculation on my part. Many
others agree, others have alternative ideas (mostly revolving around the companies
beening ran by zombie devils or something). It comes down them not wanting to change,
and force customers down a certain path. this lack of innovation will be their doom.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
TV Studios created sites like Hulu and their corp sites to host shows. WHOA! That
is a huge sidestep to cable companies! So now the customers and tv companies are both
upset with cable companies? Instead of innovating and finding alternative solutions,
companies like Comcast are sticking to their positions and solidifying by imposing
limits on how much you can download. I've never hit the 250 GB limit, but someday
I might with the way things are going!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Comcast said they imposed the limit to stop the few from abusing the service. This
is BS. If you were getting so overloaded, why was it that months later you double
all of our internet speeds and now offer up to 50mbps? Guess you have the capacity
to handle it all, don't you?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Most customers will pass this off as "the limit will not affect me" and "well, whatever,
now my speeds are faster!!!".&amp;nbsp; Screw that, they jacked the speeds up ONLY after
they were getting speed competition from Verizon FIOS and AT&amp;amp;T U-Verse. This was
done to keep their current customers and to keep the eyes of their customers covered.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm sounding like a ranting liberal who hates "the man", but I hate being treated
like a moron. I am not. I do not know everything, but I damn well know when I'm being
played.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here is what Comcast and others should do to innovate:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
They support different channel packages via CableCard. If you pay for HBO, "zap" and
now you have HBO. Stop paying your bill "zap!!", all premium channels are gone.&amp;nbsp;
I should be able to go through a checklist and be able to add/remove any channel that
I want to. I'd love to get rid of Oxygen and replace it with ESPN7. This offers a
fantastic option to customers with a system you already have in place&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
You need to go all in on this CableCard fiasco. You're really starting to piss off
your average joe of a customer. Why should your Motorola Comcast box with a CableCard
get all the channels and On-Demand while my Tivo/Vista Media Center with a Cable Card
can only get most channels and no On-Demand? Don't tell me that it's hard to innovate.
You need to kick &lt;u&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;your&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/u&gt; CableLabs in the butt and have it be much
more helpful to 3rd party OEMs. I'm still waiting for my freaking SDV adapter for
my ATI Digital Tuners. It is certainly an issue that needs to be worked on by Microsoft/ATI
in addition to CableLabs, but don't you think it would go much more smoothly if CableLabs
was actively assisting and cared? It has been deemed illegal to force people to use
your cable boxes. You're working on borrowed time while Tru2Way is deployed. You'd
better be more freaking friendly before everyone has an easy option to ditch your
box.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Some cable companies are offering video on demand watch shows. But once again, I need
your box to get that! But all in all, it's still not ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX,etc's raw show
programming offerings. You're offering yet again another proprietary system to add
another ball an chain to your customers. Make a system similar to Netflix that allows
your TV customers to access it. Maybe even sell the internet only version to people!
I'm already paying for netflix to watch TV and movies, why would I be opposed to paying
for it?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,a51d5d9b-08cf-498e-ba42-77c5c6aca6a7.aspx</comments>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <center>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/obamadtv.jpg" />
        </center>
        <br />
        <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/its-official-dtv-hard-date-moved-to-june-12/">Engadget
gave me the news </a>a few minutes ago. This time the DTV delay has gone through the
Senate AND the House, waiting for Obama to sign now. We all know he will (short of
a terrorist attack using CIP device threatening to cause an attack if he goes through
with the DTV delay). A <a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/28/DigitalTVTransitionDelayHasBeenBlocked.aspx">similar
bill failed in the House </a>recently.  I'm not going to rant <a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/09/ObamaToUsHopeAndChangeDoesntApplyToTV.aspx">again</a>,
but this is depressing and annoying. This is not the change I didn't vote for.<br /><br /><br /><center><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/picard-facepalm.jpg" /></center><br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56" /></body>
      <title>It's almost official - DTV Delayed until June 12, 2009</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/02/04/ItsAlmostOfficialDTVDelayedUntilJune122009.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/obamadtv.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/its-official-dtv-hard-date-moved-to-june-12/"&gt;Engadget
gave me the news &lt;/a&gt;a few minutes ago. This time the DTV delay has gone through the
Senate AND the House, waiting for Obama to sign now. We all know he will (short of
a terrorist attack using CIP device threatening to cause an attack if he goes through
with the DTV delay). A &lt;a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/28/DigitalTVTransitionDelayHasBeenBlocked.aspx"&gt;similar
bill failed in the House &lt;/a&gt;recently.&amp;nbsp; I'm not going to rant &lt;a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/09/ObamaToUsHopeAndChangeDoesntApplyToTV.aspx"&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;,
but this is depressing and annoying. This is not the change I didn't vote for.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/picard-facepalm.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,f6d2d41c-c65e-478b-a33a-2fa38d34fd56.aspx</comments>
      <category>Facepalm</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/digital-tv-transition-delays-fails-to-pass-in-house/">Engadget
reported</a> that the House did not reach enough votes to pass the bill that was <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/26/digital-tv-transition-officially-delayed-until-june-12th/">approved
by the Senate</a>. Personally, I think this is fantastic. <a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/09/ObamaToUsHopeAndChangeDoesntApplyToTV.aspx">Obama
wanted to delay this originally.</a> It shows that there is some sense between the
Congress and President Obama.  By some, I mean the 168 who voted negative in
the House.<br /><br />
"But Peter!!! What about the poor people who can't afford to get a converter box?"
My response: they're shit out of luck. The money that was handed out originally was
a dumb idea, and it's still a dumb idea after they ran out of money. We're not talking
about power, water, food supply, etc. We're talking about catching up on Heroes before
the season starts back up. <strike>Not worth using tax dollars to help anyone. </strike> I
stand corrected, the money doesn't come from taxes. I still think it could have gone
to better use. Like highways, debt, bigger guns, etc.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
And if we're so concerned about the economy, wouldn't it make sense to keep the transition
date and force people to upgrade? How about this for a sales pitch? "You can buy this
converter box which is sooo clunky, or you can buy this new HDTV!!!"<br /></p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff" />
      </body>
      <title>Digital TV Transition Delay Has Been Blocked!!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/28/DigitalTVTransitionDelayHasBeenBlocked.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/digital-tv-transition-delays-fails-to-pass-in-house/"&gt;Engadget
reported&lt;/a&gt; that the House did not reach enough votes to pass the bill that was &lt;a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/26/digital-tv-transition-officially-delayed-until-june-12th/"&gt;approved
by the Senate&lt;/a&gt;. Personally, I think this is fantastic. &lt;a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/09/ObamaToUsHopeAndChangeDoesntApplyToTV.aspx"&gt;Obama
wanted to delay this originally.&lt;/a&gt; It shows that there is some sense between the
Congress and President Obama.&amp;nbsp; By some, I mean the 168 who voted negative in
the House.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"But Peter!!! What about the poor people who can't afford to get a converter box?"
My response: they're shit out of luck. The money that was handed out originally was
a dumb idea, and it's still a dumb idea after they ran out of money. We're not talking
about power, water, food supply, etc. We're talking about catching up on Heroes before
the season starts back up. &lt;strike&gt;Not worth using tax dollars to help anyone.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strike&gt;&amp;nbsp;I
stand corrected, the money doesn't come from taxes. I still think it could have gone
to better use. Like highways, debt, bigger guns, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And if we're so concerned about the economy, wouldn't it make sense to keep the transition
date and force people to upgrade? How about this for a sales pitch? "You can buy this
converter box which is sooo clunky, or you can buy this new HDTV!!!"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,8029ea14-7fc2-4c25-b3eb-13e2b41a34ff.aspx</comments>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <center>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/obamadtv.jpg" border="0" />
        </center>
        <p>
Our President-Elect has preached to bring change to America. I've kept somewhat silent
on this blog about our man Obama, but this one is too good to let go by.  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/CMPSRV/idUSN0928114220090109">Engadget
posted</a> that Obama is asking Congress to delay the DTV Transition.<br /><br />
For those of you that are somehow on the internet, but don't watch TV, this involves
shutting off analog TV broadcasts and forcing people to watch digital TV (DTV) over
the air (OTA). This is a great idea and makes a lot of sense. It's more efficient
and supports HD to just keep the story short. The hypothetical bad is the following:
the people who have been blatently ignorning the many DTV transition commercials and
think the problem will just go away, will be without TV until they go buy the converter
(maybe this will help stimulate the economy).<br /><br />
If Obama has his way, this will be just like the <a href="http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Metric/pub814.cfm#act">Metric
conversion in the US</a>. Still waiting....... Companies, industries, and many Americans
have been prepping for this for a VERY long time and have been dilligent. Obama, you
were in the Senate. Why didn't you bring this up while you were there? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_campaign,_2008#Missed_votes_in_Senate">Oh
wait, you weren't there because you misspent a lot of your time campaigning for the
Presidency.</a> Thanks for representing Illinois.<br /><br /><font face="Times New Roman">............................................________........................<br />
....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,..................<br />
.............................,.-”...................................“-.,............<br />
.........................,/...............................................”:,........<br />
.....................,?......................................................\,.....<br />
.................../...........................................................,}....<br />
................./......................................................,:`^`..}....<br />
.............../...................................................,:”........./.....<br />
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../.....<br />
............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../........<br />
.........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/...........<br />
..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}...........<br />
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../............<br />
...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../.............<br />
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”...............<br />
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\...................<br />
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__...........<br />
,,_..........}.&gt;-._\...................................|..............`=~-,....<br />
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\........................<br />
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\.......................<br />
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__..<br />
.....................................`=-,...................,%`&gt;--==``.......<br />
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\...............<br />
...................................,&lt;`.._|_,-&amp;``................`\.............. </font><br /></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9" />
      </body>
      <title>Obama to Us: Hope and Change doesn't apply to TV</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2009/01/09/ObamaToUsHopeAndChangeDoesntApplyToTV.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:56:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/obamadtv.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Our President-Elect has preached to bring change to America. I've kept somewhat silent
on this blog about our man Obama, but this one is too good to let go by.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/CMPSRV/idUSN0928114220090109"&gt;Engadget
posted&lt;/a&gt; that Obama is asking Congress to delay the DTV Transition.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those of you that are somehow on the internet, but don't watch TV, this involves
shutting off analog TV broadcasts and forcing people to watch digital TV (DTV) over
the air (OTA). This is a great idea and makes a lot of sense. It's more efficient
and supports HD to just keep the story short. The hypothetical bad is the following:
the people who have been blatently ignorning the many DTV transition commercials and
think the problem will just go away, will be without TV until they go buy the converter
(maybe this will help stimulate the economy).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If Obama has his way, this will be just like the &lt;a href="http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Metric/pub814.cfm#act"&gt;Metric
conversion in the US&lt;/a&gt;. Still waiting....... Companies, industries, and many Americans
have been prepping for this for a VERY long time and have been dilligent. Obama, you
were in the Senate. Why didn't you bring this up while you were there? &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_campaign,_2008#Missed_votes_in_Senate"&gt;Oh
wait, you weren't there because you misspent a lot of your time campaigning for the
Presidency.&lt;/a&gt; Thanks for representing Illinois.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;............................................________........................&lt;br&gt;
....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,..................&lt;br&gt;
.............................,.-”...................................“-.,............&lt;br&gt;
.........................,/...............................................”:,........&lt;br&gt;
.....................,?......................................................\,.....&lt;br&gt;
.................../...........................................................,}....&lt;br&gt;
................./......................................................,:`^`..}....&lt;br&gt;
.............../...................................................,:”........./.....&lt;br&gt;
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../.....&lt;br&gt;
............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../........&lt;br&gt;
.........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/...........&lt;br&gt;
..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}...........&lt;br&gt;
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../............&lt;br&gt;
...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../.............&lt;br&gt;
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”...............&lt;br&gt;
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\...................&lt;br&gt;
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__...........&lt;br&gt;
,,_..........}.&amp;gt;-._\...................................|..............`=~-,....&lt;br&gt;
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\........................&lt;br&gt;
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\.......................&lt;br&gt;
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__..&lt;br&gt;
.....................................`=-,...................,%`&amp;gt;--==``.......&lt;br&gt;
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\...............&lt;br&gt;
...................................,&amp;lt;`.._|_,-&amp;amp;``................`\.............. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,9bc197af-565a-42cb-918d-5409a5797ab9.aspx</comments>
      <category>Facepalm</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/DirecTV%20HDPC-20.jpg" border="0" align="left" />Long
story short: DirecTV is bitch slapping Microsoft for not integrating Satellite TV
into the Media Center TV Pack 2008 release.  Since it was not integrated, the
feature would have to wait until Windows 7. As much as MS is shooting for next year,
DirecTV knows better.<br /><br />
It is still very depressing that DirecTV isn't going to stick it out. VMC won my heart
when it could integrate many different sources into one UI creating a true 'set-top
box experience' through a PC.  Integrating Satellite TV would be one more way
to corner the market and provide something NOONE else can.<br /><br /><a href="http://thedigitallifestyle.com/cs/blogs/ian/archive/2008/12/09/no-directv-for-media-center.aspx">http://www.gearlog.com/2008/12/its_official_the_directv_hdpc2.php</a> from <a href="http://thedigitallifestyle.com/cs/blogs/ian/archive/2008/12/09/no-directv-for-media-center.aspx">http://thedigitallifestyle.com/cs/blogs/ian/archive/2008/12/09/no-directv-for-media-center.aspx</a></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539" />
      </body>
      <title>DirecTV for PC future is dead</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/12/10/DirecTVForPCFutureIsDead.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/DirecTV%20HDPC-20.jpg" border="0" align="left"&gt;Long
story short: DirecTV is bitch slapping Microsoft for not integrating Satellite TV
into the Media Center TV Pack 2008 release.&amp;nbsp; Since it was not integrated, the
feature would have to wait until Windows 7. As much as MS is shooting for next year,
DirecTV knows better.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It is still very depressing that DirecTV isn't going to stick it out. VMC won my heart
when it could integrate many different sources into one UI creating a true 'set-top
box experience' through a PC.&amp;nbsp; Integrating Satellite TV would be one more way
to corner the market and provide something NOONE else can.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://thedigitallifestyle.com/cs/blogs/ian/archive/2008/12/09/no-directv-for-media-center.aspx"&gt;http://www.gearlog.com/2008/12/its_official_the_directv_hdpc2.php&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href="http://thedigitallifestyle.com/cs/blogs/ian/archive/2008/12/09/no-directv-for-media-center.aspx"&gt;http://thedigitallifestyle.com/cs/blogs/ian/archive/2008/12/09/no-directv-for-media-center.aspx&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,3322f652-2651-4d48-a819-ae5c8d41d539.aspx</comments>
      <category>Hardware</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/hd-dvd%20@%20CC.jpg" border="0" align="left" />Chris
was out shopping @ Circuit City and gets excited,"Do I want Bourne on Blu-Ray?" Fortunately,
he realized he asked himself the wrong question and decided to snap a picture. I miss
the HD format war. Reminds me of my Browncoat days.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906" />
      </body>
      <title>Oh, cool Bourne on Blu-Ray.... wait a second.....</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/12/05/OhCoolBourneOnBluRayWaitASecond.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/hd-dvd%20@%20CC.jpg" border="0" align="left"&gt;Chris
was out shopping @ Circuit City and gets excited,"Do I want Bourne on Blu-Ray?" Fortunately,
he realized he asked himself the wrong question and decided to snap a picture. I miss
the HD format war. Reminds me of my Browncoat days.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,59d5becf-39bb-4fac-832d-e64474745906.aspx</comments>
      <category>Awesome Nerd Humor</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <img src="content/binary/cablecard.jpg" align="left" />So
glad you asked. I'm going to give this to you in a story (then a rant), but we'll
start with some background.<br /><br />
An ATI Digital CableCard tuner will encrypt ALL shows recorded, period. Some have
noted that this may change to only encrypt shows that request it, but this doesn't
solve the overall problem.  This DRM chain is built off of many items: (i don't
remember the exact ones, but this is a good start) GPU, Processor, Motherboard. Note:
you can only buy your initial pc from an OEM so you have a secondary product code
purely for the cablecard setup<br /><br />
Once you start recording shows, if you change a single item of hardware: BOOM, you
can NEVER watch your recorded shows.  This happens because the hardware change
caused a break in the DRM chain. You will have to erase all of your shows, and start
from scratch.<br /><br />
OK, story time....<br /><br />
Bought a refurbished MediaCenter, Sony Vaio VGX-XL3. I doubled up the RAM, bought
a new GPU, and added an additional tuner card. Everything works GREAT, except that
the ATI GPU is not compatible with the new Media Center TV Pack 2008. Now, first off,
I'm no fool. This was a leaked update, and it was my own risk. I totally understand
this, so I'm only willing to put the blame on Microsoft in the fact that they went
along with this DRM scheme for 1 reason. I will have put my old GPU (nvidia 7000 series)in
the computer, I will want to put the new one in once ATI updates their drivers. <i>"Wait...
didn't we just talk about that?" </i>It will destory my DRM chain and create a new
one. <i>"But Peter, why won't you just use the non-TV pack version?"</i> I'm spoiled
by the new features? It handles multiple TV sources MUCH better than the previous
release and it handles HD much better in the guide. Plus, even if I were to leave
the ATI GPU in and run the orginal Vista Media Center, I'd still lose my DRM chain
by upgrading to the TV pack! I might as well keep the TV pack and deal with the older
GPU. Note: the reason I'm freaking out is due to the fact that Comcast is coming tomorrow
to install my CableCards.<br /><img src="content/binary/vaio%20media%20center.jpg" align="right" /><br />
So if you followed me through the this rant, hopefully you'll come to my same conclusion...
DRM sucks. It's pointless and extreme overkill. CableLabs, Microsoft, Comcast, NBC,
FOX, FCC, whoever is willing to listen. GO LOOK at the torrent sites out there. All
of your shows are out there, they will continue to be out there, and you usually release
your shows on your website anyway!!!!! (I hate the "who cares because it's going to
happen anyway arguement, but honestly, they'll never be 100% protected" for whoever's
diety's sake, they were happy Batman: Dark Knight was only leaked hours after the
movie was released??? ) So why would a typical CableCard PC owner have to pay over
$1000 to get screwed from so many angles? This is all done for one purpose: so you
cannot copy a tv episode file from your PC to a different PC. Lame!<br /><br />
I call BS, someone needs to stand up and try using some common sense. I'm sure most
of this started with CableLabs and everyone just caved to them since CableLabs dragged
their feet releasing the CableCards in the first place and everyone was happy when
it finally came out. Also, how was it that there was a specification to for 2-way
communication for Cable Co's to use on their DVR boxes, but it JUST WASN'T possible
to put the 2-way communication in the first CableCard release? This makes me cringe
EVERY time I talk to Comcast about CableCards,"But sir, if you use a CableCard, you
won't be able to get On-Demand content. Which DVR box would you like?". It takes every
bit of energy for me to hold back and not go ballistic. I usually come up with something
clever,"It keeps me from giving your more money".<br /><br />
Image 1 Credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Img_5022.jpg<br />
Image 2 Credit: me!<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede" /></body>
      <title>Why is CableCard DRM bad?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/10/10/WhyIsCableCardDRMBad.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:10:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;img src="content/binary/cablecard.jpg" align="left"&gt;So glad you asked. I'm going
to give this to you in a story (then a rant), but we'll start with some background.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
An ATI Digital CableCard tuner will encrypt ALL shows recorded, period. Some have
noted that this may change to only encrypt shows that request it, but this doesn't
solve the overall problem.&amp;nbsp; This DRM chain is built off of many items: (i don't
remember the exact ones, but this is a good start) GPU, Processor, Motherboard. Note:
you can only buy your initial pc from an OEM so you have a secondary product code
purely for the cablecard setup&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Once you start recording shows, if you change a single item of hardware: BOOM, you
can NEVER watch your recorded shows.&amp;nbsp; This happens because the hardware change
caused a break in the DRM chain. You will have to erase all of your shows, and start
from scratch.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OK, story time....&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Bought a refurbished MediaCenter, Sony Vaio VGX-XL3. I doubled up the RAM, bought
a new GPU, and added an additional tuner card. Everything works GREAT, except that
the ATI GPU is not compatible with the new Media Center TV Pack 2008. Now, first off,
I'm no fool. This was a leaked update, and it was my own risk. I totally understand
this, so I'm only willing to put the blame on Microsoft in the fact that they went
along with this DRM scheme for 1 reason. I will have put my old GPU (nvidia 7000 series)in
the computer, I will want to put the new one in once ATI updates their drivers. &lt;i&gt;"Wait...
didn't we just talk about that?" &lt;/i&gt;It will destory my DRM chain and create a new
one. &lt;i&gt;"But Peter, why won't you just use the non-TV pack version?"&lt;/i&gt; I'm spoiled
by the new features? It handles multiple TV sources MUCH better than the previous
release and it handles HD much better in the guide. Plus, even if I were to leave
the ATI GPU in and run the orginal Vista Media Center, I'd still lose my DRM chain
by upgrading to the TV pack! I might as well keep the TV pack and deal with the older
GPU. Note: the reason I'm freaking out is due to the fact that Comcast is coming tomorrow
to install my CableCards.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/vaio%20media%20center.jpg" align="right"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So if you followed me through the this rant, hopefully you'll come to my same conclusion...
DRM sucks. It's pointless and extreme overkill. CableLabs, Microsoft, Comcast, NBC,
FOX, FCC, whoever is willing to listen. GO LOOK at the torrent sites out there. All
of your shows are out there, they will continue to be out there, and you usually release
your shows on your website anyway!!!!! (I hate the "who cares because it's going to
happen anyway arguement, but honestly, they'll never be 100% protected" for whoever's
diety's sake, they were happy Batman: Dark Knight was only leaked hours after the
movie was released??? ) So why would a typical CableCard PC owner have to pay over
$1000 to get screwed from so many angles? This is all done for one purpose: so you
cannot copy a tv episode file from your PC to a different PC. Lame!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I call BS, someone needs to stand up and try using some common sense. I'm sure most
of this started with CableLabs and everyone just caved to them since CableLabs dragged
their feet releasing the CableCards in the first place and everyone was happy when
it finally came out. Also, how was it that there was a specification to for 2-way
communication for Cable Co's to use on their DVR boxes, but it JUST WASN'T possible
to put the 2-way communication in the first CableCard release? This makes me cringe
EVERY time I talk to Comcast about CableCards,"But sir, if you use a CableCard, you
won't be able to get On-Demand content. Which DVR box would you like?". It takes every
bit of energy for me to hold back and not go ballistic. I usually come up with something
clever,"It keeps me from giving your more money".&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Image 1 Credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Img_5022.jpg&lt;br&gt;
Image 2 Credit: me!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,65f61387-5ccb-473e-897f-8eff2de53ede.aspx</comments>
      <category>Hardware</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <center>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/399px-Netflix_Logo.svg.png" border="0" />
        </center>
        <br />
Just received an email this morning from NetFlix announcing that they will be charging
me $1 more per month for access to unlimited Blu-ray movies.  I've just been
waiting to see the hammer fall, and it finally has. It's not a huge charge, so I'll
live with it. I'd be much happier if they told me they were charging more to send
me HD-DVDs<br /><br /><blockquote><font size="2" face="arial,helvetica">Dear Peter,</font><br /><br /><font size="2" face="arial,helvetica">As you may know, Blu-ray movies are more expensive
than standard definition movies. As a result, we're going to start charging $1 a month
(plus applicable taxes), in addition to your monthly membership charge, for unlimited
access to Blu-ray movies.</font><br /><br /><font size="2" face="arial,helvetica">The additional charge for unlimited Blu-ray
access will be automatically added to your next billing statement on or after November
5th, 2008 and will be referenced in your Membership Terms and Details. If you wish
to continue getting Blu-ray movies for $1 a month more, you don't need to do anything.
If not, you can remove Blu-ray access anytime by visiting Your Account at the Netflix
website.</font><br /><br /><font size="2" face="arial,helvetica">If you have questions about this change or need
any assistance, please call us anytime at 1-888-638-3549.</font><br /><br /><font size="2" face="arial,helvetica">-The Netflix Team</font><br /></blockquote><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e" /></body>
      <title>NetFlix officially charging $1 more for Blu-Ray access</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/10/08/NetFlixOfficiallyCharging1MoreForBluRayAccess.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/399px-Netflix_Logo.svg.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just received an email this morning from NetFlix announcing that they will be charging
me $1 more per month for access to unlimited Blu-ray movies.&amp;nbsp; I've just been
waiting to see the hammer fall, and it finally has. It's not a huge charge, so I'll
live with it. I'd be much happier if they told me they were charging more to send
me HD-DVDs&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font size="2" face="arial,helvetica"&gt;Dear Peter,&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="2" face="arial,helvetica"&gt;As you may know, Blu-ray movies are more expensive
than standard definition movies. As a result, we're going to start charging $1 a month
(plus applicable taxes), in addition to your monthly membership charge, for unlimited
access to Blu-ray movies.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="2" face="arial,helvetica"&gt;The additional charge for unlimited Blu-ray
access will be automatically added to your next billing statement on or after November
5th, 2008 and will be referenced in your Membership Terms and Details. If you wish
to continue getting Blu-ray movies for $1 a month more, you don't need to do anything.
If not, you can remove Blu-ray access anytime by visiting Your Account at the Netflix
website.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="2" face="arial,helvetica"&gt;If you have questions about this change or need
any assistance, please call us anytime at 1-888-638-3549.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="2" face="arial,helvetica"&gt;-The Netflix Team&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,238c95d7-8164-40ae-b20e-829924a59c1e.aspx</comments>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Thanks to an <strike>*official*</strike><strike>*unofficial*</strike>,
who gives a **** , a simple registry key will unlock most of the WinTV lineup from
Hauppauge in Vista Media Center<br /><br /><a href="http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/permalink/293058/292728/ShowThread.aspx#292728">http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/permalink/293058/292728/ShowThread.aspx#292728</a><br /><center><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/VMC-QAM-HVR1800.jpg" border="0" /><br />
Photo taken with HTC Tilt by PeterFnet<br /></center><br /><br />
Just make sure you try it with the latest drivers that are public, and you'll be in
the clear. I did not even have to update my drivers. Works great! I don't have as
many channels as I had in OTA, but this could be all that Comcast provides to me over
Clear QAM. I'll see what the WinTV app finds for QAM channels and compare.  Once
they get it working for the true dual tuner (HVR-2250), I'll be purchasing that!<br /><br />
Thanks to mjp14 for posting it!<br /><br /><br /><blockquote><span>REGEDIT4</span><br /><span>;</span><br /><span>; NOTE: this file should ONLY be used to enable Clear QAM support on Fiji</span><br /><span>;<span>  </span>(ie, "Windows Vista Media Center Feature Pack 2008")</span><br /><span>;</span><br /><span>; Using this file WILL break applications that only support the legacy "ATSC
Network Provider"</span><br /><span>; Apps must be recompiled to use the newer "MS Network Provider" if this file
is used</span><br /><span>;</span><br /><span>; These keys control exposing support of Fiji compatible QAM for various ATSC
products</span><br /><span>;<span>  </span>(of course, the HW products must be physically capable
of supportting QAM!!!)</span><br /><span>;</span><br /><span>; You MUST restart you system after this file is installed for the changes to
take effect</span><br /><span>;</span><br /><span>; HVR-1250, HVR-1290, HVR-1500q, HVR-1800, HVR-1850 </span><br /><span>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW85BDA\Parameters]</span><br /><span>"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001</span><br /><span><span> </span></span><br /><span>; HVR-1600 (only some models support QAM; should list them here)</span><br /><span>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW18BDA\Parameters]</span><br /><span>"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001</span><br /><span><span> </span></span><br /><span>; HVR-USB2, HVR-1950</span><br /><span>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW73BDA\Parameters]</span><br /><span>"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001</span><br /><span><span> </span></span><br /><span>; HVR-950q</span><br /><span>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW72DTV\Parameters]</span><br /><span>"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001</span><br /><span><span> </span></span><br /><span>; HVR-2250 (not yet supporrted)</span><br /></blockquote><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc" /></body>
      <title>ClearQAM with HVR-1800 on VMC -TGB</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/09/12/ClearQAMWithHVR1800OnVMCTGB.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Thanks to an &lt;strike&gt;*official*&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;*unofficial*&lt;/strike&gt;, who gives
a **** , a simple registry key will unlock most of the WinTV lineup from Hauppauge
in Vista Media Center&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/permalink/293058/292728/ShowThread.aspx#292728"&gt;http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/permalink/293058/292728/ShowThread.aspx#292728&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/VMC-QAM-HVR1800.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Photo taken with HTC Tilt by PeterFnet&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just make sure you try it with the latest drivers that are public, and you'll be in
the clear. I did not even have to update my drivers. Works great! I don't have as
many channels as I had in OTA, but this could be all that Comcast provides to me over
Clear QAM. I'll see what the WinTV app finds for QAM channels and compare.&amp;nbsp; Once
they get it working for the true dual tuner (HVR-2250), I'll be purchasing that!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks to mjp14 for posting it!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span&gt;REGEDIT4&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; NOTE: this file should ONLY be used to enable Clear QAM support on Fiji&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;(ie, "Windows Vista Media Center Feature Pack 2008")&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; Using this file WILL break applications that only support the legacy "ATSC
Network Provider"&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; Apps must be recompiled to use the newer "MS Network Provider" if this file
is used&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; These keys control exposing support of Fiji compatible QAM for various ATSC
products&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;(of course, the HW products must be physically capable
of supportting QAM!!!)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; You MUST restart you system after this file is installed for the changes to
take effect&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; HVR-1250, HVR-1290, HVR-1500q, HVR-1800, HVR-1850 &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW85BDA\Parameters]&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; HVR-1600 (only some models support QAM; should list them here)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW18BDA\Parameters]&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; HVR-USB2, HVR-1950&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW73BDA\Parameters]&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; HVR-950q&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HCW72DTV\Parameters]&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;"AllowQAM_PowerToy"=dword:00000001&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span&gt;; HVR-2250 (not yet supporrted)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,3728de27-2e5d-41a2-9749-6fcfda3da0dc.aspx</comments>
      <category>Hardware</category>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/08/are-there-two-vista-media-center-updates-due-this-year/">This
popped up on EngadgetHD</a> and I'm very excited. Naturally, it's unofficial, but
this would <a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/06/11/QAMInMediaCenterPainful.aspx">stop
me from being very cranky</a>. Native QAM support in Media Center would mean a much
wider audience of Media Center. Mom and Pop could go to the store, pick up their Media
Center, and get high def right off the bat.  Naturally, this means if this turns
out to be false, I will slip into a deeper nerd depression<br /><br />
Update: <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/17/windows-media-center-tv-pack-was-released-yesterday/">Patch
released to OEM</a><br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c" /></body>
      <title>Native QAM in Media Center Might Be Almost Upon Us</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/07/08/NativeQAMInMediaCenterMightBeAlmostUponUs.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/08/are-there-two-vista-media-center-updates-due-this-year/"&gt;This
popped up on EngadgetHD&lt;/a&gt; and I'm very excited. Naturally, it's unofficial, but
this would &lt;a href="http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/06/11/QAMInMediaCenterPainful.aspx"&gt;stop
me from being very cranky&lt;/a&gt;. Native QAM support in Media Center would mean a much
wider audience of Media Center. Mom and Pop could go to the store, pick up their Media
Center, and get high def right off the bat.&amp;nbsp; Naturally, this means if this turns
out to be false, I will slip into a deeper nerd depression&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Update: &lt;a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/17/windows-media-center-tv-pack-was-released-yesterday/"&gt;Patch
released to OEM&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,75945d7a-c46f-4f5c-8510-04f3ab794a0c.aspx</comments>
      <category>HDTV</category>
      <category>Media Center</category>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <center>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/john_mccain_cylon.png" border="0" />
        </center>
        <br />
This came to my attention via a <a href="http://digg.com/movies/Will_Smith_to_Play_Barack_Obama_on_the_Big_Screen?t=16411161#c16412860">Digg
comment</a> and I've been laughing to myself ever since.  There is a pretty sweet
resemblance. Though, I do have to admit, this photo below is MUCH better<br /><center><img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/mccainortigh.png" border="0" /><br />
http://www.adampieniazek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/mccainortigh.png
</center><br /><br />
Update: Shoutout to Bryan &amp; LOTR clan from congaming.com<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9" /></body>
      <title>John McCain is Cylon - Sweet!!!!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/06/26/JohnMcCainIsCylonSweet.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/john_mccain_cylon.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This came to my attention via a &lt;a href="http://digg.com/movies/Will_Smith_to_Play_Barack_Obama_on_the_Big_Screen?t=16411161#c16412860"&gt;Digg
comment&lt;/a&gt; and I've been laughing to myself ever since.&amp;nbsp; There is a pretty sweet
resemblance. Though, I do have to admit, this photo below is MUCH better&lt;br&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/mccainortigh.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://www.adampieniazek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/mccainortigh.png
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Update: Shoutout to Bryan &amp;amp; LOTR clan from congaming.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,309d8436-eab0-48f0-9c85-e13b9d1beae9.aspx</comments>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <center>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/IMG_0725.JPG" border="0" />
        </center>
        <br />
I'm at the Sox game. Great game! My sister caught a foul ball and the White Sox are
winning. 
<br /><br />
Onto the nerdy stuff. Just got an email from Netflix. They're discontinuing profiles.
They never worked well, so at least they're going away. The main problem was that
different profiles couldn't watch instant material. Sox scored. I can understand their
hesitation since it could lead to abuse, but this could be avoided with limitations
on the number of profiles and length of viewing allowed. 
<br />
Sox scored. Thome almost had a heart attack. 
<br /><br />
Sent from my Windows Mobile® phone.<br /><br /><p></p>
Update: Photo added, was supposed to be email-to-blog, but 1and1 blocks sockets....
ftl. Looking for new hosting provider.<img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07" /></body>
      <title>Netflix discontinuing profiles (blogging at a ball game... )</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/06/19/NetflixDiscontinuingProfilesBloggingAtABallGame.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/IMG_0725.JPG" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm at the Sox game. Great game! My sister caught a foul ball and the White Sox are
winning. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Onto the nerdy stuff. Just got an email from Netflix. They're discontinuing profiles.
They never worked well, so at least they're going away. The main problem was that
different profiles couldn't watch instant material. Sox scored. I can understand their
hesitation since it could lead to abuse, but this could be avoided with limitations
on the number of profiles and length of viewing allowed. 
&lt;br&gt;
Sox scored. Thome almost had a heart attack. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sent from my Windows Mobile® phone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
Update: Photo added, was supposed to be email-to-blog, but 1and1 blocks sockets....
ftl. Looking for new hosting provider.&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,bdfd650e-abd4-4f0e-8c93-e163db834d07.aspx</comments>
      <category>TV</category>
      <category>Web</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.peterf.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.peterf.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterf.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/earth.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="left" />Short
but nerdy post. 
<br />
Want a reason why Battlestar Galactica is better than Voyager? The series didn't suddenly
end when they entered the orbit of Earth. 
<br />
Those who know me, know I've complained about this before. BSG didn't make me start
jumping wildly,"You've got to be kidding me?!!?!". People tried to calm me with the
prospect of a follow-up movie, but wait.. what's that next Star Trek movie? That's
right.... set way waaay before Voyager. 
<br /></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e" />
      </body>
      <title>Battlestar Galactica vs Star Trek Voyager</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterf.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.peterf.net/blog/2008/06/17/BattlestarGalacticaVsStarTrekVoyager.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/earth.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="left"&gt;Short
but nerdy post. 
&lt;br&gt;
Want a reason why Battlestar Galactica is better than Voyager? The series didn't suddenly
end when they entered the orbit of Earth. 
&lt;br&gt;
Those who know me, know I've complained about this before. BSG didn't make me start
jumping wildly,"You've got to be kidding me?!!?!". People tried to calm me with the
prospect of a follow-up movie, but wait.. what's that next Star Trek movie? That's
right.... set way waaay before Voyager. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.peterf.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.peterf.net/blog/CommentView,guid,617f6f04-b460-4fd2-90e7-08fde791e94e.aspx</comments>
      <category>TV</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>